GROWTH-RESPONSE TO GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) TREATMENT RELATES TO SERUM INSULIN-LIKE-GROWTH-FACTOR-I (IGF-I) AND IGF-BINDING PROTEIN-3 IN SHORT CHILDREN WITH VARIOUS GH SECRETION CAPACITIES
B. Kristrom et al., GROWTH-RESPONSE TO GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) TREATMENT RELATES TO SERUM INSULIN-LIKE-GROWTH-FACTOR-I (IGF-I) AND IGF-BINDING PROTEIN-3 IN SHORT CHILDREN WITH VARIOUS GH SECRETION CAPACITIES, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 82(9), 1997, pp. 2889-2898
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the
l-yr (n = 193) and 2-yr (n = 128) growth response and the individual s
erum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I(ICF-I) and IGF-bin
ding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) before and during GK treatment. Our study gro
up of prepubertal short children had from very low to high GH secretor
y capacity, estimated during an arginine-insulin tolerance test, and t
he ages ranged from 3-15 yr at the start of treatment. Their serum lev
els of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were low before treatment compared to those i
n an age-related reference group of prepubertal children and increased
significantly from the start to 1 month of GH treatment. The mean inc
rease in height so score was 0.80 so score after 1 yr of GH treatment
and 1.26 sn score after 2 yr, with a wide range. In univariate analyse
s the highest correlation coefficients to the 2-yr growth response wer
e found to be us. the following variables from the start of treatment:
IGF-I so score (r = -0.49), log maximum GH concentration (log GH(max)
) during the arginine-insulin tolerance test (r = -0.47), difference b
etween the height so score of the individual child and the midparental
height sn score (diffSD score; r = -0.45), IGFBP-3 so score (r = -0.3
9), age (r = -0.30), short term change in IGFBP-3 so score (r = 0.37),
and IGF-I so score (r = 0.34). In multivariate stepwise regression an
alysis, 41% of the variation in the 2-yr growth response could be expl
ained by IGF-I so score or log GH(max) together with age at the start
of treatment, weight sn score at 1 yr of age, and diffSD score. When b
oth IGF-I so score and GH(max) were included and when the short term c
hanges in IGF-I so score were added, 46% and 58% of the variation, res
pectively, could be explained. The regression algorithms using differe
nt combinations of variables and their corresponding prediction interv
als are also presented.