DISSOCIATION BETWEEN THE EFFECTS OF SOMATOSTATIN (SS) AND OCTAPEPTIDESS-ANALOGS ON HORMONE-RELEASE IN A SMALL SUBGROUP OF PITUITARY-TUMOR AND ISLET-CELL-TUMOR
Lj. Hofland et al., DISSOCIATION BETWEEN THE EFFECTS OF SOMATOSTATIN (SS) AND OCTAPEPTIDESS-ANALOGS ON HORMONE-RELEASE IN A SMALL SUBGROUP OF PITUITARY-TUMOR AND ISLET-CELL-TUMOR, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 82(9), 1997, pp. 3011-3018
The effects of somatostatin (SS-14 and/or SS-28) and of the three octa
peptide SS-analogs that are available for clinical use (octreotide, BI
M-23014 and RC-160) on hormone release by primary cultures of 15 clini
cally nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFA), 7 prolactinomas, and 2
insulinomas were investigated. In the pituitary adenoma cultures, a co
mparison was made with the effects of the dopamine (DA) agonists bromo
criptine and/or quinagolide. In 5 NFAs, 2 prolactinomas and 1 insulino
ma somatostatin receptor (subtype) expression was determined by ligand
binding studies and by in situ hybridization to detect sst(1), sst(2)
, and sst(3) messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Four NFA cultures did not secrete
detectable amounts of alpha-subunit, FSH, and/or LH. In the other cul
tures, hormone and/or subunit release was inhibited by DA-agonists (10
nM) in 9 of 11, by SS (10 nM) in 7 of 11, and by octapeptide SS-analo
gs (10 nM) in 3 of 10 cultures. In three NFA cultures, hormone release
was sensitive to SS but not to SS-analogs. In all cultures, except fo
r one, DA-agonists were the most effective in inhibiting hormone relea
se. In the prolactinoma cultures, PRL release was inhibited by DA-agon
ists (10 nM) in 7 of 7, by SS in 4 of 4, and by octapeptide SS-analogs
in 3 of 7 cultures. A dissociation between the effects of SS and SS-a
nalogs was found in 3 cases. In the cultures sensitive to both bromocr
iptine and SS-28, bromocriptine was the most potent compound in 2 out
of 4 cultures. In the 2 other cultures, both compounds were equally ef
fective. In 2 insulinoma cultures, insulin release was inhibited by SS
, and by octapeptide SS-analogs in only one. The presence or absence o
f an inhibitory effect by octreotide was in all cases in parallel with
the presence or absence of the inhibitory effect by BIM-23014 and RC-
160. Autoradiographic studies using [I-125-Tyr(0)]SS28 showed specific
binding in 4 of 5 NFAs, 1 of 2 prolactinomas, and 1 of 1 insulinoma.
Specific [I-125-Tyr(3)]octreotide binding was found in 2 of 5 NFAs, in
1 of 2 prolactinomas,and in the insulinoma. Two NFAs showed binding o
f SS28, but not of the sst(2,5) specific ligand octreotide. The tumors
showed variable sst(1) and/or sst(3) mRNA expression, whereas no sst(
2) expression was found. In conclusion, a dissociation between the inh
ibitory effects of SS on the one hand and of the octapeptide SS-analog
s octreotide, BIM-23014 and RC-160 on the other hand, is observed in a
small subgroup of NFAs, prolactinomas, and insulinomas, suggesting th
at novel sst subtype specific SS-analogs might be of benefit in the tr
eatment of selected patients with somatostatin receptor positive secre
ting tumors not responding to octapeptide SS-analogs. However, in the
majority of NFAs and prolactinomas, DA-agonists were equally or more e
ffective than SS in the suppression of tumoral secretion products.