Ta. Diprete et al., COLLECTIVIST VERSUS INDIVIDUALIST MOBILITY REGIMES - STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AND JOB MOBILITY IN 4 COUNTRIES, American journal of sociology, 103(2), 1997, pp. 318-358
Job mobility is produced by structural forces of expansion and contrac
tion as well as by individual choices. But labor market structure and
welfare state policies will create distinctive national patterns of la
bor force adjustment to shifts in technology, markets, and the consequ
ent demand for particular forms of labor. In a four-nation comparative
study, U.S. rates of job mobility showed the greatest sensitivity to
structural change and to the labor market resources of individual work
ers. The Netherlands was at the opposite pole, with worker outcomes la
rgely insulated from structural forces. Germany's strong labor market
boundaries channeled adjustment within sectors or between employment a
nd nonemployment, while Sweden's pattern was intermediate between that
of the United States and Germany.