Objective: This study attempted to determine how often psychiatric res
idents are exposed to violence, the types of violence they encounter,
and what institutional changes might increase their safety. Methods: S
afety conditions at two private general hospitals and one state hospit
al that served as training sites for a psychiatric residency program w
ere assessed through a survey of psychiatric residents and site visits
to the hospitals. The survey asked residents to quantify violent inci
dents occurring in the emergency rooms, wards, and clinics at each sit
e, The site visits focused on safety issues related to staff training,
physical layout, staffing patterns, current policies, and compliance
with policies. Results: All 47 residents in the training program respo
nded to the survey. None reported serious injury, although as many as
56 percent had been physically assaulted on the wards of one hospital,
and 54 percent of residents had encountered a weapon in one emergency
room, Almost all residents had been verbally threatened or had witnes
sed violence to others. A paradoxical finding of the survey was that t
he residents felt safest in the hospital that had the highest rate of
violence. The site visits revealed that deficiencies in the safety pro
cedures were allowing weapons to be brought into patient care areas. C
onclusions: Psychiatric residents are often exposed to dangerous situa
tions, although serious injury is rare. Residents' beliefs about their
level of safety seem to be influenced more by how competent they perc
eive the staff to be than by the frequency of violence. The findings f
rom the site visits pointed to two steps to increase safety, creating
a weapon-free environment by searching all patients and finding ways t
o improve compliance with existing safety measures.