Objective: The authors describe the APA Practice Research Network (PRN
), a national research initiative that ultimately will engage 1,000 pr
acticing psychiatrists in collaborative clinical and services research
. The PRN is designed to generate practice-relevant information and to
inform future service delivery, policy, and financing decisions perti
nent to psychiatry. Method: The authors review the relative strengths
and limitations of practice-based research compared with other widely
used research methods. They also describe the structure of the PRN and
its procedures for recruiting network members and for identifying and
developing specific network studies. The three primary sources of dat
a for the PRN are 1) the biannual National Survey of Psychiatric Pract
ice, which provides not only a mechanism for randomly recruiting the t
wo-thirds of network participants who are not volunteers but also a ba
seline for assessing the generalizability of PRN findings; 2) separate
biannual studies of psychiatric patients and treatments to characteri
ze the network patient/treatment denominator, which is used to monitor
trends in psychiatric practice and plan network studies; and 3) speci
fic studies. Results: Pilot data from the PRN have yielded detailed in
formation on the diagnostic and clinical characteristics of 725 patien
ts and on the treatments provided by network psychiatrists. Conclusion
s: The APA PRN offers a powerful complement to traditional clinical an
d health services research approaches, The PRN will help psychiatry im
prove its ability to meet patients' needs in a context of rapidly evol
ving scientific and clinical progress and legislative and economic for
ces affecting health care delivery.