M. Argenziano et al., THE INFLUENCE OF INFECTION ON SURVIVAL AND SUCCESSFUL TRANSPLANTATIONIN PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation, 16(8), 1997, pp. 822-831
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System",Transplantation,"Respiratory System
Background: Mechanical cardiac assistance has recently emerged as a te
nable option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. In spite of
recent technical improvements that have reduced the incidence of life-
threatening complications, the reported frequency of infections in the
se patients has remained high. Methods: Over a 5-year period, 60 patie
nts underwent insertion of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at
our institution. Detailed medical records were kept prospectively for
all patients, and a variety of endpoints were analyzed, including the
incidence, nature, and sequelae of infections before and after LVAD im
plantation and after transplantation. Results: Twenty-nine of 60 patie
nts (48%) undergoing LVAD insertion subsequently had development of in
fections. The most frequent sites of infection were blood, LVAD drivel
ines, and central venous catheters, representing 61% of all infections
. At the time of LVAD implantation, 13 of 60 patients (22%) had cultur
e-proven infections. In spite of an increased incidence of subsequent
infection (77% vs 40%), there were no differences in rates of mortalit
y (31% vs 26%), LVAD endocarditis, (23% vs 11%) and eventual transplan
tation (62% vs 57%) between these patients and those without periimpla
ntation infections. Although the overall mortality rate was not influe
nced by infections during LVAD support (28% vs 26%), the development o
f LVAD endocarditis was associated with a high mortality rate. Finally
, although patients with infections during LVAD support had significan
tly longer median support times than those who remained infection free
(101 vs 49 days, respectively), there was no difference in the rate o
f successful transplantation (59% vs 58%) or in the rate of infection
after transplantation (35% vs 28%). Conclusions: Infections are common
in patients undergoing LVAD support, but they do not adversely affect
survival, the rate of successful transplantation, or the incidence of
posttransplantation infection. Periimplantation infections may increa
se the risk of subsequent infections, but they also do not influence s
urvival or transplantability. Patients with development of LVAD endoca
rditis are at increased risk for morbidity and death and require early
and aggressive therapy, potentially including device explantation.