CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS RECEIVING OR FORGOING RESUSCITATION AT THE TIME OF CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST

Citation
Hf. Ghusn et al., CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS RECEIVING OR FORGOING RESUSCITATION AT THE TIME OF CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(9), 1997, pp. 1118-1122
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Geiatric & Gerontology","Geiatric & Gerontology
ISSN journal
00028614
Volume
45
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1118 - 1122
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8614(1997)45:9<1118:COPROF>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical, functional and social characteristics of DNR patients at the time of their cardiopulmonary arrest with chara cteristics of patients who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESI GN: Retrospective chart review of all 261 patients who had a cardiopul monary arrest during a 6-month period in an academic institution. SETT ING: Teaching Veterans Affairs Medical Center serving a large metropol itan area. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, medical diagnose s, and measures of functional status were collected when DNR orders we re initiated and at the time of cardiopulmonary arrest. RESULTS: The m ean age of the studied group was 62 years. Ninety-nine percent were ma les, and the majority were non-Hispanic white men. One hundred ninety- eight (76%) patients/proxies elected for limiting treatment. Most (85% ) elected a DNR order only. Patients were the most frequently document ed participants in advance directive decisions in the DNR group. At th e time of cardiopulmonary arrest, a higher proportion of the CPR group had coronary artery disease or chronic renal failure, and a higher pr oportion of the DNR group had cancer or AIDS. The functional status of the DNR group deteriorated from the time of DNR order to death. At th e time of cardiopulmonary arrest, the majority of both groups were dep endent in all functional domains, and 70% of the DNR group were stupor ous or comatose compared with 47% of the CPR group (P = .05). DNR pati ents were hospitalized for an average of 13.7 +/- 29.5 days after a DN R order was initiated. Six of the 81 patients who received CPR (7.4%) were alive at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians deciding to implement a DNR order may be overly focused on medical diagnoses a nd less so on functional status. A significant proportion of patients with clinical characteristics associated with poor CPR outcome are ele cting for CPR.