We employed an adaptive management approach to initiate a program usin
g contraceptives to control growth of a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus) population in a suburban environment. Demographic data ga
thered as part of a 4-year culling effort were used to calibrate the r
elationship between population size (N) and sustained yield (SY). We m
odeled population dynamics to estimate the numbers of deer necessary t
o cull and treat with contraceptives to maintain a stationary populati
on. We determined the effort required to achieve and maintain various
population goals based on an estimated relationship between effort and
N. Preliminary estimates suggested that ecological carrying capacity
(K) was 858 deer and maximum sustained yield (MSY) was 124 deer. Numbe
rs of deer to be culled to maintain a stationary population were simil
ar at corresponding points on either side of MSY (e.g., about 110 deer
removed at 257 or 601 deer), but effort was much greater when the pop
ulation was on the left arm of the SY parabola (e.g., 545 hrs vs. 1,06
4 hrs to remove 110 deer from N of 257 and 601, respectively). Numbers
of females to treat with contraceptives (234 deer) were dissimilar at
corresponding points on the SY parabola and higher than numbers to be
culled (110 deer) at N of 601 because females were not removed from t
he population. Effort to implement contraception alone was greater tha
n culling alone because of the increased numbers of females involved,
and the necessity for 2 contraceptive treatments (e.g., at N of 429; 3
,037 and 910 hr to treat and cull deer, respectively). Modeling predic
tions were especially sensitive to estimates of nonculling loss in the
population and the relationship between N and effort. Future manageme
nt actions should incorporate an experimental design to improve these
estimates.