RELATIVE VALUE OF PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY, AND BREAST SONOGRAPHY IN EVALUATING THE SIZE OF THE PRIMARY TUMOR AND REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN WOMEN RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLYADVANCED BREAST-CARCINOMA
J. Herrada et al., RELATIVE VALUE OF PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY, AND BREAST SONOGRAPHY IN EVALUATING THE SIZE OF THE PRIMARY TUMOR AND REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN WOMEN RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLYADVANCED BREAST-CARCINOMA, Clinical cancer research, 3(9), 1997, pp. 1565-1569
The purpose of this study was to correlate physical examination and so
nographic and mammographic measurements of breast tumors and regional
lymph nodes with pathological findings and to evaluate the effect of n
eoadjuvant chemotherapy on clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage by non
invasive methods, This was a retrospective analysis of 100 patients wi
th locally advanced breast cancer registered and treated in prospectiv
e trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, All patients received four cycle
s of a doxorubicin-containing regimen and had noninvasive evaluation o
f the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes before and after neoadjuv
ant chemotherapy by physical examination, sonography? and mammography
and underwent breast surgery and axillary dissection within 5 weeks af
ter com-pletion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The correlations between
clinical and pathological measurements mere determined by Spearman ran
k correlation analysis, A proportional odds model was used to examine
predictive values, Eighty-three patients had both a clinically detecta
ble primary tumor and lymph node metastases, Sixty-four patients had a
decrease in Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage after chemotherapy, For 54% o
f patients, there was concordance in clinical response between the pri
mary tumor and lymph node compartment; for the rest, results were disc
ordant, Physical examination correlated best with pathological finding
s in the measurement of the primary tumor (P = 0.0003), whereas sonogr
aphy was the most accurate predictor of size for axillary lymph nodes
(P = 0.0005). The combination of physical examination and mammography
worked best for assessment of the primary tumor (P = 0.003), whereas c
ombining physical examination with sonography gave optimal evaluation
of regional lymph nodes (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, physical examinat
ion is the best noninvasive predictor of the real size of locally adva
nced primary breast cancer, whereas sonography correlates better with
the real dimensions of axillary lymph nodes, The combination of physic
al examination with either mammography or sonography significantly imp
roves the accuracy of noninvasive assessment of tumor dimensions.