A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF CATHETER ABLATION OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA AS ADJUVANT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE AND AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR
Citation
Sa. Strickberger et al., A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF CATHETER ABLATION OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA AS ADJUVANT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE AND AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR, Circulation, 96(5), 1997, pp. 1525-1531
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology
SICI code
0009-7322(1997)96:5<1525:APEOCA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is int
egral to current therapy for ventricular tachycardia. Patients with an
ICD frequently require concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Despi
te this, some patients still receive frequent ICD therapies for ventri
cular tachycardia. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective study wa
s to determine the utility of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in p
atients with an ICD who experience frequent ICD therapies. Methods and
Results Twenty-one consecutive patients with frequent ICD therapies d
espite antiarrhythmic drug therapy were the subjects of this study. Th
e mean age was 69+/-6 years, and 17 were men. The mean ejection fracti
on was 0.22+/-0.08, and all patients had coronary artery disease. Duri
ng the 36+/-51 days (range, 4 days to 7 months) preceding the ablation
procedures, the patients received 34+/-55 ICD therapies for the clini
cal ventricular tachycardia, or a mean of 25+/-88 ICD therapies per mo
nth. The patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of the presumed cl
inical ventricular tachycardia by inducing the tachycardia and mapping
according to endocardial activation, continuous electrical activity,
pace mapping, concealed entrainment, or mid-diastolic potentials. Abla
tion of the clinical arrhythmia was successful in 76% of patients duri
ng 1.4+/-0.6 (range, 1 to 3) ablation procedures and required 12.5+/-9
.2 applications of energy. During 11.8+/-10.0 months of follow-up, the
frequency of ICD therapies per month decreased from 60+/-80 before su
ccessful ablation to 0.1+/-0.3 ICD therapies per month after ablation
(P=.01). A quality-of-life assessment demonstrated a significant impro
vement after successful (P=.02) but not unsuccessful ablation (P=.9).
Conclusions Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia as adju
vant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and an ICD has a
reasonable success rate, significantly reduces ICD therapies, and app
ears to be associated with an improved quality of life.