C. Gilbert, VISUAL CONTROL OF CURSORIAL PREY PURSUIT BY TIGER BEETLES (CICINDELIDAE), Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 181(3), 1997, pp. 217-230
Target detection poses problems for moving animals, such as tiger beet
les, that track targets visually. The pursuer's movements degrade targ
et image contrast and induce reafferent image movement that confounds
continuous detection of prey. In nature, beetles pursue prey discontin
uously with several iterations of stop-and-go running. The beetle's dy
namics were analyzed by filming pursuits of prey or experimenter-contr
olled dummies. Durations of stops are inversely related to prey visual
angular velocity; as the prey image moves between neighboring ommatid
ial fields, the beetle relocalizes it and renews running. During subse
quent runs, translation and rotation depend upon prey visual angular v
elocity and position, respectively, seen during the previous stop. The
beetle runs, then stops, while prey continues moving. After two to th
ree iterations of stop-and-go the beetle catches its prey, suggesting
open-loop control of running. Computational model simulations produce
good qualitative spatio-temporal fit with actual pursuits. However, wh
en pursuing prey dummies, beetles track continuously and quickly follo
w changes in target position, suggesting closed-loop control using a p
osition-sensitive servo mechanism. Differences between these types of
pursuit control system are discussed with respect to limitations in si
gnal detection, particularly spatio-temporal contrast, that may force
beetles to use an open-loop system.