To what extent can we account for the educational achievement data of
minority francophone, aboriginal, and African Canadian students using
Ogbu's (1978, 1992) distinction between voluntary and involuntary mino
rities? While Ogbu's distinction is useful in highlighting the impact
of status and power relations on student achievement, a more flexible
and inclusive framework is needed to account for the variability of ac
ademic outcomes and to plan educational interventions that will challe
nge the way school failure is constructed. Academic growth among subor
dinated-group students will result only from educator-student interact
ions that actively promote collaborative relations of power and contes
t the still pervasive influence of coercive relations of power.