COMPARISON OF 2 FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TECHNIQUES (FATS) FOR DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF RENIBACTERIUM-SALMONINARUM IN CELOMIC FLUID OF SPAWNING CHINOOK SALMON ONCORHYNCHUS-TSHAWYTSCHA
Dg. Elliott et Cl. Mckibben, COMPARISON OF 2 FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TECHNIQUES (FATS) FOR DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF RENIBACTERIUM-SALMONINARUM IN CELOMIC FLUID OF SPAWNING CHINOOK SALMON ONCORHYNCHUS-TSHAWYTSCHA, Diseases of aquatic organisms, 30(1), 1997, pp. 37-43
Two versions of the fluorescent antibody technique (FAT) were compared
for detection and quantification of Renibacterium salmoninarum in coe
lomic fluid samples from naturally infected spawning chinook salmon On
corhynchus tshawytscha. For the membrane filtration-FAT (MF-FAT), tryp
sin-treated samples were passed through 0.2 mu m polycarbonate filters
to concentrate bacteria for direct enumeration by immunofluorescence
microscopy. For the smear-FAT (S-FAT), samples were centrifuged at 880
0 x g for 10 min and the pelleted material was smeared on slides for i
mmunofluorescence staining. Detected prevalences of Renibacterium salm
oninarum were 1.8 to 3.4 limes higher by the MF-FAT than by the S-FAT;
differences were significant at p less than or equal to 0,0002. The S
-FAT consistently detected R. salmoninarum only in samples with calcul
ated bacterial concentrations greater than or equal to 2.4 x 10(3) cel
ls ml(-1) by MF-FAT testing. Increasing the area examined on a filter
or slide from 50 to 100 microscope fields at 1000x magnification resul
ted in the detection of a maximum of 4 % additional positive samples b
y the MF-FAT and 7 % additional positive samples by the S-FAT. In indi
vidual samples for which bacterial counts were obtained by both the MF
-FAT and the S-FAT, the counts averaged from 47 times (+/-30 SD) to 17
5 times (+/-165 SD) higher by the MF-FAT. Centrifugation of samples at
10000 x g for 10 min resulted in a 4-fold increase in mean bacterial
counts by the S-FAT compared with a 10-min centrifugation at 2000 x g,
but the highest calculated bacterial concentration obtained by S-FAT
testing was more than 6-fold lower than that obtained for the same sam
ple by MF-FAT testing. Because of its greater sensitivity, the MF-FAT
is preferable to the S-FAT for use in critical situations requiring th
e detection of low numbers of R. salmoninarum.