AIRWAY HYPERREACTIVITY IN CHILDREN WITH SICKLE-CELL DISEASE

Citation
Ma. Leong et al., AIRWAY HYPERREACTIVITY IN CHILDREN WITH SICKLE-CELL DISEASE, The Journal of pediatrics, 131(2), 1997, pp. 278-283
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223476
Volume
131
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
278 - 283
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3476(1997)131:2<278:AHICWS>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Progressive restrictive defect with increasing age, obstructive lung d isease, and bronchodilator responsiveness have been reported in sickle cell disease (SCD. Because airway hyperreactivity (AHR) can be undere stimated when assessed by bronchodilator responsiveness in patients wi th normal baseline lung function, the aim of this study was to investi gate the prevalence of AHR in SCD by cold-air bronchial provocation te sting, and to assess whether AHR can be present in symptom-free patien ts with SCD. Forty patients aged 6 to 19 years (mean, 10.7 years +/- 3 .5 SD) performed pulmonary function tests. Eighteen were known to have a history of reactive airway disease (RAD group), and 22 had no known history of RAD (non-RAD group). A control group, aged 6 to 17 years ( mean, 10.5 +/- 3.1 years), consisted of 10 siblings of the non-RAD SCD group. There were no significant differences in age and height among the groups. If the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was gre ater than 70%, cold air challenge (CACh) was performed; if the FEV1 wa s less than 70%, aerosolized bronchodilator therapy was given. A decre ase in FEV1 of more than 10% after CACh or an increase in FEV1 of 12% or greater after bronchodilator inhalation was considered evidence of AHR In the RAD group, the total lung capacity was 88.9% +/- 14.0% of r ace-corrected predicted values, the forced vital capacity was 91.2% +/ - 12.6%, and FEV1 was 85.3% +/- 16.2%. The mean maximal percent fall i n FEV1 after CACh (n = 13) was 18.5% +/- 9.6% and was greater than 10% in 11 of 13 patients. The mean increase in FEV1 after bronchodilator therapy (n = 5) was 11.5% +/- 8.3%, and it was greater than 12% in 4 o f 5 patients. In the non-RAD group the baseline total lung capacity wa s 101.6% +/- 11.7%, forced vital capacity was 95.5% +/- 10.2%, and FEV 1 was 93.3% +/- 13.2%. The mean maximal percent fall in FEV1 after CAC h (n = 19) was 14.1% +/- 8.8% and was greater than 10% in 13 of 19 pat ients. The mean increase in FEV1 after bronchodilator therapy (n = 3) was 14.7% +/- 11.3%, and was 12% or greater in 1 of 3 patients. In the control group the baseline total lung capacity was 105.7% +/- 12.1%, forced vital capacity was 96.2% +/- 11.1%, and FEV1 was 92.9% +/- 10.3 %. The mean maximal percent fall in FEV1 was 5.0% +/- 2.5%, and was gr eater than 10% in none of 10 patients. The prevalence of AHR in the co ntrol group, the RAD group, and the non-RAD group was zero, 83%, and 6 4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The overall prevalence in the SCD group was 73%. We conclude that there is a high prevalence of AHR in childr en with SCD and that airway hyperreactivity may exist in patients with SCD even in the absence of the clinical symptoms of RAD. AHR may be a significant component of sickle cell lung disease.