Bl. Stalnaker et al., CHARACTERISTICS OF SUCCESSFUL CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT BY THE FLORIDA-NEUROLOGIC-INJURY-COMPENSATION-ASSOCIATION FUND, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 177(2), 1997, pp. 268-271
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine the obstetric characteristics o
f claims paid by the State of Florida after the birth of a neurologica
lly impaired child. STUDY DESIGN: The Florida Birth Related Neurologic
al Injury compensation plan is a no-fault alternative to litigation fo
r compensation after a catastrophic neurologic birth injury. The plan
has specific criteria for inclusion. We retrospectively analyzed claim
s for compensation that were accepted and paid (n = 64) after a birth-
related neurologic injury. Simple description statistics were compiled
for the relative frequencies of various obstetric correlates found in
successful claims for payment. RESULTS: Seventy percent of infants (4
5) were delivered by cesarean section and 15 of 19 vaginal deliveries
(79%) were operative (forceps or vacuum), yielding a 94% operative del
ivery rate. A persistent nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing was se
en before delivery in all cases. The 5-minute Apgar score was less tha
n or equal to 6 in 91% of deliveries and the 10-minute Apgar score was
<6 in 86% of deliveries. When first examined in the labor and deliver
y suite, 17 women had a nonreassuring fetal heart rate, and a nonreass
uring tracing developed in labor in 47. Nine attempts at vaginal birth
after a cesarean section led to a uterine rupture. Seven of these del
iveries were either inductions or augmentations against an unfavorable
cervix. Forty-five percent (27) of deliveries were associated with me
conium-stained amniotic fluid, including 17 infants with meconium aspi
ration syndrome. There were three shoulder dystonias acid four infants
with group B streptococcal sepsis. in eight cases (12.5%), there appe
ared to be a breach of the published standard of care, which contribut
ed to the poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Most of these cases should not hav
e been eligible for compensation in a traditional tort-based system be
cause the applicable standard of care was not breached. Meeting the pu
blished standard for perinatal care failed to prevent these devastatin
g neurologic injuries. Obviously, not all intrapartum injuries can be
prevented; however, if we are to prevent similar injuries in the futur
e, we will need to examine the clinical management in these or similar
case for clues to develop novel strategies to respond to intrapartum
emergencies. An unexpected finding was the frequency of catastrophic b
irth injuries alter an attempted Vaginal birth after cesarean section
with the predominance of these deliveries associated with oxytocin sti
mulation against an unripe cervix. It is apparent that the push to low
er cesarean section rates is no; without some risk.