Minimisation is the top priority of the waste management hierarchy, wh
ich is one of the guiding principals for national solid waste manageme
nt planning throughout the developed world. As such it should be encou
raged as a means for reducing wastes which require treatment and dispo
sal, whether they be household, commercial or industrial in source. Th
is paper suggests that minimisation is not being given the necessary p
olicy frameworks or legislation within which to develop in the UK, and
questions whether minimisation is being afforded the respect and atte
ntion, from all levels, that is due the most preferable waste option a
ccording to the hierarchy. This theme is investigated by surveying the
county councils of England as a representative sample of waste dispos
al authorities in England, and former waste regulation authorities. Th
ey are responsible for guiding local and district waste policy and are
the regional waste planners in the UK. If they are not seriously taki
ng on board the message of minimisation, then there is little chance t
hat it will succeed without further legislative developments. Some 59%
of English counties have a minimisation policy, whilst only 47% have
participated in and supported a minimisation programme or trial within
their region. The majority of these developments have occurred within
the last three years, and 78% of counties who have participated in a
programme have found it a successful venture. By 1999 79% of English c
ounties will have been actively involved in a minimisation programme i
n their region, which is a positive scenario. This trend must continue
if waste minimisation is to become the key theme of future sustainabl
e waste management in the UK as was intended by declarations at the Ri
o '92 conference and in subsequent UK Government policy and strategy.
(C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.