INTERNAL VALIDITY OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER, OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER, AND OVERT CONDUCT DISORDER SYMPTOMS IN YOUNG-CHILDREN - IMPLICATIONS FROM TEACHER RATINGS FOR A DIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO SYMPTOM VALIDITY
Gl. Burns et al., INTERNAL VALIDITY OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER, OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER, AND OVERT CONDUCT DISORDER SYMPTOMS IN YOUNG-CHILDREN - IMPLICATIONS FROM TEACHER RATINGS FOR A DIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO SYMPTOM VALIDITY, Journal of clinical child psychology, 26(3), 1997, pp. 266-275
Uses a dimensional approach to evaluate the internal validity of the a
ttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) inattention (I) and hyp
eractivity/impulsivity (H/I), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and
overt conduct disorder (CD) symptoms (i.e., whether a symptom has a s
tronger correlation with its own dimension than the other three dimens
ions). In Study 1, teachers rated 1,445 children on the DSM-II-R I, H/
I, ODD, and overt CD symptoms. In Study 2, teachers rated 1,711 childr
en on the DSM-IV I, H/I, ODD, and overt CD symptoms. All the I symptom
s showed internal validity in both studies. In contrast, the H/I sympt
oms and the ODD symptoms, especially the H/I symptoms, showed weaker i
nternal validity. All the overt CD symptoms showed internal validity e
xcept the DSM-IV bullies others symptom, with this symptom being more
strongly related to the ODD dimension. Confirmatory factor analysis pr
ovided support for a 4-factor model consisting of I, H/I, ODD, and ove
rt CD factors. Finally, the importance of internal validity for the co
nstruct validation of the disruptive behavior symptoms is discussed.