Fm. Ferrante et al., THE ROLE OF CONTINUOUS BACKGROUND INFUSIONS IN PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR AND DELIVERY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(1), 1994, pp. 80-84
The use of a background infusion with intravenous patient-controlled a
nalgesia (IV-PCA) increases drug consumption without any additional co
ntribution to analgesia. There are no data on the potential advantage
of a background infusion administered with patient-controlled epidural
analgesia (PCEA) for labor and delivery. Sixty women were randomized
to one of four groups and received either: (a) demand dose PCEA (deman
d dose = 3 mL; lockout interval = 10 min); (b) continuous infusion plu
s demand dose PCEA (two separate infusion rates: 3 mL/h and 6 mL/h); o
r (c) a fixed-rate continuous epidural infusion (CEI) at 12 mL/h. Ah p
atients received 0.125% bupivacaine with 2 mu g/mL, of fentanyl. The s
tudy protocol was double-blind and placebo-controlled. Visual analog p
ain scores, motor strength, and bilateral pinprick analgesia were asse
ssed every half hour by a blinded observer. Pain scores, cephalad exte
nt of sensory analgesia, and motor block were no different among the s
tudy groups during the first and second stages of labor. Cumulative ho
urly bupivacaine use was similar among all PCEA study groups. However,
use of PCEA (in whatever mode) provided a 35% dose-sparing effect in
comparison to CEI. The PCEA groups receiving no background infusion or
a 3-mL/h background infusion had a greater need for physician-adminis
tered supplemental bupivacaine during the first stage of labor. While
not statistically significant, a trend toward increased need for suppl
ementation was seen in these same patient groups over the entire cours
e of labor and delivery. Patients with a continuous background infusio
n of 6 mL/h plus demand dose PCEA obligatorily received 33% of their m
aximum hourly demand dose as a background infusion. The need for physi
cian-administered supplementation was minimal. Yet, pain scores, exten
t of sensory analgesia, degree of motor block, and cumulative hourly b
upivacaine use were equivalent to all other PCEA groups. Thus, adminis
tration of a significant but modest proportion (i.e., 33%) of the maxi
mum hourly demand dose as a continuous background infusion is appropri
ate for PCEA during labor and delivery.