According to the official U.S. measure of poverty, in 1995 the child p
overty rate in this country was nearly 21%, compared with an adult pov
erty rate of 11%. This article explores why, according to the official
measure, there are so many poor children. Working from the premise th
at children are poor because they live with poor adults, the reasons f
or adult poverty are reviewed. Both economic forces and demographic tr
ends have contributed to growing inequality of earnings among workers.
That inequality coupled with stagnating real earnings has increased p
overty. In addition, education, age, and race affect an individual's e
arning capacity; the article examines the likelihood that an individua
l will earn enough to keep his or her family out of poverty, given the
individual's educational attainment, age, and race. The reasons for t
he large difference between the child and adult poverty rates are expl
ored, using a decomposition of the poverty population to show how demo
graphic characteristics such as higher fertility rates among poor fami
lies and the higher prevalence of single-parent families among the poo
r lead to substantially higher poverty rates for children than for adu
lts. Finally, the article examines the validity of the official povert
y measure and reviews how an alternative measure proposed by a Nationa
l Research Council panel would address the official measure's shortcom
ings. If the panel's proposed measure were adopted, it would change th
e statistical face of poor children. It would, for example, show an in
crease in the proportion of poor children who live in families with tw
o parents and a corresponding decrease in the proportion in families w
ith only one parent, and it would show an increase in the proportion o
f children who live in families with at least one full-time employed a
dult and a corresponding decrease in the proportion in families with n
o adult employed full time.