C. Biriell et Ir. Edwards, REASONS FOR REPORTING ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS - SOME THOUGHTS BASED ONAN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 6(1), 1997, pp. 21-26
A pilot study was made to explore positive reasons for physicians and
pharmacists taking time to report adverse reactions, rather than reaso
ns for failing to report which has been studied by many authors. The 3
4 national drug monitoring centres participating in the international
programme at the time of the study were asked by letter from the WHO C
ollaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala to inve
stigate the reasons why adverse reactions were reported. National Cent
res were asked to write to 20 consecutive reporters, sending each a co
py of their own report, asking why they had chosen to report that part
icular reaction, and asking for more general comment. Twelve countries
responded with information about the habits and views of the reporter
s of 177 cases. Since this was an explorative pilot study the letter t
o reporters deliberately had only an open question about reason for re
porting. Categories were developed by the WHO Centre from the response
s given. Reasons for reporting fell into a total of 14 categories with
the great majority in the top six: motivation to contribute to medica
l knowledge reaction previously unknown to reporter reaction to new dr
ug all significant reactions reported known association between drug a
nd reaction severity of reaction. (C) 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.