S. Overgaard et al., IMPROVED FIXATION OF POROUS-COATED VERSUS GRIT-BLASTED SURFACE TEXTURE OF HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED IMPLANTS IN DOGS, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 68(4), 1997, pp. 337-343
We inserted, in 8 dogs, implants with either porous-coated or grit-bla
sted titanium surface and coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) into trabecu
lar bone in the proximal humerus, using a 1 mm gap model. After 25 wee
ks, push-out tests showed that energy absorption for porous-coated imp
lants was twice that of grit-blasted implants, whereas shear stiffness
was reduced by one fifth, indicating a stronger fixation of porous-co
ated implants. Macroscopically, all grit-blasted implants had delamina
tion of the HA coating, whereas porous implants failed mostly at the H
A-tissue interface. Porous-coated implants had 47% bone ingrowth and g
rit-blasted implants 70% (p = 0.02), however, no difference in absolut
e surface area was found. Part of the HA coating was resorbed during t
he implantation period as regards volume and thickness. HA coverage wa
s more reduced on porous-coated than on grit-blasted implants (p = 0.0
1). No foreign-body reaction or osteolysis was seen. An important find
ing was that one fifth of the surface with complete resorption of HA c
oating was replaced by newly formed bone.