DETECTION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF GRAPEVINE YELLOWS PHYTOPLASMAS BELONGING TO THE ELM YELLOWS GROUP AND TO THE STOLBUR SUBGROUP BY PCR AMPLIFICATION OF NONRIBOSOMAL DNA
X. Daire et al., DETECTION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF GRAPEVINE YELLOWS PHYTOPLASMAS BELONGING TO THE ELM YELLOWS GROUP AND TO THE STOLBUR SUBGROUP BY PCR AMPLIFICATION OF NONRIBOSOMAL DNA, European journal of plant pathology, 103(6), 1997, pp. 507-514
Primer pairs were designed from a cloned DNA probe of a strain of flav
escence doree (FD) phytoplasma and from a cloned DNA probe of a strain
of stolbur phytoplasma. Among an array of reference phytoplasma strai
ns maintained in periwinkle, pair FD9f/r amplified a 1.3 kb DNA fragme
nt only with phytoplasma strains of elm yellows (EY) group, i.e. two s
trains of FD and two strains of EY. Tru9I restriction analysis of the
fragment amplified by FD9f/r revealed a diversity among EY-group phyto
plasmas. The FD strains differed from the strains isolated from elm. T
he profile of the phytoplasmas infecting the grapevine samples from Ca
talonia and most of the samples from Northern Italy were identical to
that of a FD strain. Three other profiles were detected in grapevine f
rom Palatinate, in Germany. The two primer pairs derived from a stolbu
r strain, STOL4f/r and STOL11f2/r1, specifically amplified a 1.7 kb an
d a 0.9 kb DNA fragment, respectively, with all strains in the stolbur
subgroup. However, the pair STOL4f/r did not recognise strain MOL. Bo
th pairs allowed to detect phytoplasmas in diseased grapevines from Fr
ance, Italy, Spain and Israel. Attempts to differentiate between phyto
plasmas in the stolbur subgroup by restriction analyses failed. The pa
irs FD9/r and STOL112/r1 could be used in the same reaction (multiplex
PCR) to detect BY-group phytoplasmas, stolbur-subgroup phytoplasmas o
r both phytoplasmas simultaneously when template DNAs were mixed.