Following a decade of increasing non English-speaking background (NESB
) migration to Australia, including the migration of unprecedented lev
els of NESB professionals, this article examines two recent studies wh
ich report cases of direct and indirect labour market discrimination.
The first relates to qualifications recognition for migrant doctors. K
ey findings include a growing trend to federal government intervention
(in alliance with the medical professional bodies) to limit the entry
and registration of migrant doctors, as well as the potential for Eng
lish language ability to negatively impact on pre-registration examina
tion outcomes. The second study concerns labour market outcomes achiev
ed by an elite sample of Australia's skilled migration programme - mig
rant engineers of prime workforce age and advanced level English, with
fully recognized qualifications pre-migration. Based on longitudinal
research conducted over a three year period, this study reports signif
icant evidence of employer bias by region of origin, operating in favo
ur of English-speaking background (ESB) and European origin engineers,
compared with those of Asian or Middle Eastern origin. The findings o
f both studies are contextualized by reference to a 1997 study (based
on the Australian census) which reports the employment outcomes obtain
ed by migrant professionals by country of origin, including the length
of time taken to achieve professional integration.