Many scholars have noted that brahmacharya (celibacy) is an important
concept in Hindu notions of male identity (cf. Kakar 1981, 1982, 1990;
Obeyesekere 1976, 1981;for comparison, see Gilmore 1990). Although th
e psychological basis of this concept has been studied, there is very
little in the literature on the ''medical mechanics'' of being and bec
oming a brahmachari. Nor is there a comprehensive account of the preci
se relationship between sex and the meaning of physical health in mode
rn urban India. Through an examination of the popular Hindi literature
on brahmacharya, interpreted within the context of therapeutic celiba
cy as put in practice by a modern yoga society, this article shows how
a discourse about sex, semen, and health is conceived of in terms of
embodied truth. Using Foucault's critique of Western sexuality as a co
ntrasting frame of reference, I argue that the ''truth'' about sex in
modern North India is worked out in somatic rather than psychological
terms, in which morality is problematically defined by male physiology
and gendered conceptions of good health.