Jj. Dechant et al., MONTH OF BIRTH EFFECT DOES NOT ALTER LONGITUDINAL GROWTH IN AN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL-MODEL, American journal of human biology, 9(4), 1997, pp. 481-486
Previous cross-sectional human and animal data collected in the southe
rn hemisphere suggest that month of birth influences growth throughout
life; individuals born between August and January (spring/summer) wer
e larger than individuals born between February and July (fall/winter)
throughout their life cycle. It has been suggested that there is some
form of annual global variation which may be caused by extraterrestri
al factors, The present study, utilizing an experimental animal model,
investigated the ''month of birth effect'' in the northern hemisphere
on the somatic and skeletal growth of rabbits. The study sample consi
sted of 135 laboratory bred and reared New Zealand white rabbits (Oryc
tolagus cuniculus) from 62 different litters; spring/summer rabbits (n
= 75) were born between February and July; fall/winter rabbits (n = 6
0) were born between August and January. Serial longitudinal body mass
and craniofacial radiographic growth data were collected at 10, 25, 4
2, 84, and 126 days of age. Results from a two-way ANOVA showed no sig
nificant (P > 0.05) differences in the month of birth main effect or i
n the age x month of birth interaction for either somatic or skeletal
growth, Results from the present study do not support the ''month of b
irth effect'' hypothesis, It was concluded that variations in growth p
atterns are more likely controlled by local environmental factors such
as hemispheric seasonality in photoperiod or temperature, and not by
more exotic factors such as the earth's orbital trajectory around the
sun or global energy fields. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.