OSTEOID OSTEOMA - VALUE OF MR-IMAGING

Citation
K. Hachem et al., OSTEOID OSTEOMA - VALUE OF MR-IMAGING, Journal de radiologie, 78(9), 1997, pp. 635-641
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
02210363
Volume
78
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
635 - 641
Database
ISI
SICI code
0221-0363(1997)78:9<635:OO-VOM>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a frequently encountered benign bone tumor, seen in young adults with male predominance. Materials and methods: Nine patients complaining of nonspecific extremity pain unde rwent MRI examination. The sequences obtained were T1 and T2 weighted spin-echo and T2 weighted gradient echo. A CT scan examination followe d in all cases, exploring the region of the abnormal signal seen on MR I. The results of both examinations were compared. Results: In six of the nine patients (66.6%) MRI showed evidence suggestive of osteoid os teoma, comparable that seen on CT scan. In three patients (33.3%), MRI showed a nonspecific and ill-defined bone marrow signal abnormality. CT cuts focused on those areas of signal abnormality showed the nidus. Discussion: MRI is more sensitive than CT scan in detecting soft tiss ue and bone marrow abnormalities adjacent to an osteoid osteoma. This may produce a misleading aggressive appearance on MR images. CT scanni ng is more specific than MRI, by showing the nidus. In three patients studied, the nidus was only seen by CT, the other six osteoid osteomas were equally seen by CT and by MRI. in our study, MRI revealed abnorm alities in all the cases. It was also highly specific for osteoid oste oma in 66.6%. Conclusion: MRI is very sensitive in detecting bone marr ow and soft tissue abnormalities, and can suggest the diagnosis of OO in a good number of patients. In the remainder cases MRI guides the CT -scan. CT is more accurate and remains the definite examination for th e diagnosis of OO, by showing the nidus.