CONTROL ALGORITHMS AND CIRCUIT DESIGNS FOR OPTIMAL FLYBACK-CHARGING OF AN ENERGY-STORAGE CAPACITOR (EG FOR FLASH LAMP OR DEFIBRILLATOR)

Authors
Citation
No. Sokal et R. Redl, CONTROL ALGORITHMS AND CIRCUIT DESIGNS FOR OPTIMAL FLYBACK-CHARGING OF AN ENERGY-STORAGE CAPACITOR (EG FOR FLASH LAMP OR DEFIBRILLATOR), IEEE transactions on power electronics, 12(5), 1997, pp. 885-894
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic
ISSN journal
08858993
Volume
12
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
885 - 894
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-8993(1997)12:5<885:CAACDF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
A flyback type of transformer-coupled dc/dc converter supplies a train of current pulses to charge an energy-storage capacitor to a desired high voltage, converting input de power obtained from a lower voltage de source, The energy-storage capacitor is charged to a specified volt age within a specified time with minimum peak and rms currents in the transistor, the rectifier diode, the transformer windings, and the de power source, minimizing the i(2)R losses, This is done by generating 1) energy-storage current pulses in the power transistor and the trans former primary winding in which the current increment from the beginni ng to the end of a pulse is only a small fraction of the final (peak) value and 2) energy-delivery flyback current pulses in the capacitor a nd the transformer secondary winding in which the current decrement fr om the beginning to the end of a pulse is only a small fraction of the initial (peak) value, Recommended methods are: 1) hysteretic current- mode control with current sensing in both transformer windings; 2) pea k-current-commanding current-mode control with switching frequency or transistor-nonconducting time varying in a prescribed way during the c harging; or 3) valley-current-commanding current-mode control with swi tching frequency or transistor-conducting time varying in a prescribed way during the charging, Compared with one nonoptimal method, peak cu rrents are reduced by a factor of about 2 and i(2)R power losses are r educed by a factor of about 1.33.