Experiences and ideas of eugenic 'field-workers' offer a new historica
l perspective on American eugenics, while highlighting terms of women'
s early twentieth-century scientific education and research employment
. To advance knowledge of heredity, the US Eugenics Record Office (ERO
) between 1910 and 1924, trained 258 students (85% of them women) to c
ollect information about individuals, families and communities. Though
some historians have dismissed eugenic field-workers as careless or u
ncritical, many had scientific or medical backgrounds, and took resear
ch seriously. While gendered expectations and other obstacles limited
women's hopes for professional advance, the female field-workers creat
ed a strong community and culture of their own. Comparing notes, some
recognized that their results did not support eugenic assumptions, and
cautioned against letting enthusiasm overwhelm scientific integrity T
hese women field-workers raised serious questions about methodology an
d ethics, but the situation of eugenics work at the time undermined ch
ances for such criticism to be acknowledged. After World War I, milita
ry-related research and political manoeuvring dominated eugenics, furt
her marginalizing field-workers. Ironically, while ERO head Charles Da
venport had wanted students to promote eugenics, some demonstrated mor
e fundamental commitment to scientific ideals - but to little avail.