SUCCESSFUL SINGLE-DOSE TEICOPLANIN PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL STREPTOCOCCAL, ENTEROCOCCAL, AND STAPHYLOCOCCAL AORTIC-VALVE ENDOCARDITIS

Citation
Gs. Perdikaris et al., SUCCESSFUL SINGLE-DOSE TEICOPLANIN PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL STREPTOCOCCAL, ENTEROCOCCAL, AND STAPHYLOCOCCAL AORTIC-VALVE ENDOCARDITIS, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 41(9), 1997, pp. 1916-1921
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Microbiology
ISSN journal
00664804
Volume
41
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1916 - 1921
Database
ISI
SICI code
0066-4804(1997)41:9<1916:SSTPAE>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that is administered both int ramuscularly and intravenously. It has a prolonged half-life and a les s toxic profile in comparison to those of vancomycin. The efficacy of a single dose of teicoplanin (18 mg/kg of body weight given intramuscu larly) for the prevention of endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis, Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was evaluated after applying the rabbit model. Vancomycin at a single dose of 30 mg/kg given intravenously was used as the comparati ve agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to MRSA and E. faecium , while ampicillin at a single dose of 40 mg/kg given intravenously wa s used as the comparative agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to S. oralis. Rabbits in the teicoplanin group were infected at 1 h p ostdosing with similar or equal to=10(7) CFU of each strain. Rabbits i n the other groups were infected at 0.5 h postdosing with similar or e qual to 10(7) CFU of S. oralis (ampicillin group) or E. faecium and MR SA (vancomycin group). All rabbits were sacrificed 5 days later. Teico planin and vancomycin protected the animals challenged with E. faecium by 87.5 and 50%, respectively, and protected the animals challenged w ith MRSA by 100 and 92%, respectively. Teicoplanin and ampicillin prot ected the animals challenged with S. oralis by 100 and 77%, respective ly. Prevention of endocarditis by teicoplanin was likely to be due to a prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth by the sustained supra-MICs . It is concluded that teicoplanin is very effective in preventing exp erimental streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal endocarditis and may be an attractive alternative antibiotic in patients allergic to beta-lactams, especially in the outpatient setting.