During locomotion, observers respond to objects in the environment tha
t may represent obstacles to avoid or landmarks for navigation. Althou
gh much is known about how visual cortical neurons respond to stimulus
objects moving against a blank background, nothing is known about the
ir responses when objects are embedded in optic flow fields (the patte
rns of motion seen during locomotion). We recorded from cells in the l
ateral suprasylvian visual area (LS) of the cat, an area probably anal
ogous to area MT. In our first experiments, optic flow simulations mim
icked the view of a cat trotting across a plain covered with small bal
ls; a black bar lying on the balls served as a target object. In subse
quent experiments, optic flow simulations were composed of natural ele
ments, with target objects representing bushes, rocks, and variants of
these. Cells did not respond to the target bar in the presence of opt
ic flow backgrounds, although they did respond to it in the absence of
a background. However, 273/423 cells responded to at least one of the
taller, naturalistic objects embedded in optic flow simulations. Thes
e responses might represent a form of image segmentation, in that cell
s detected objects against a complex background. Surprisingly, the res
ponsiveness of cells to objects in optic flow fields was not correlate
d with preferred direction as measured with a moving bar or whole-fiel
d texture. Because the direction of object motion was determined solel
y by receptive-field location, it often differed considerably from a c
ell's preferred direction. About a quarter of the cells responded well
to objects in optic flow movies but more weakly or not at all to bars
moving in the same direction as the object, suggesting that the optic
flow background modified or suppressed direction selectivity.