The theory of finalization in science - and the debate it sparked in t
he lan 1970s and early 1980s - continues to generate interest among so
cial theorists studying science and scientific development But the ins
ights generated by this theory have yet to be tallied and its merits f
ully assessed This article pursues a number of important ideas that ca
me out of a recent effort to revisit finalization theory in Bielefeld.
It begins with a brief review of the Starnberg model of finalization
and the ideas of the Alternatives in Science group. It then moves beyo
nd the Starnberg model to consider the issues raised at Bielefeld and
the question of science ''in the public interest''.