ON CONSISTENT DISCRETIZATION OF INERTIA TERMS FOR C-0 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WITH MODIFIED STIFFNESS MATRICES

Citation
Hk. Stolarski et Jf. Dcosta, ON CONSISTENT DISCRETIZATION OF INERTIA TERMS FOR C-0 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WITH MODIFIED STIFFNESS MATRICES, International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 40(18), 1997, pp. 3299-3312
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Application, Chemistry & Engineering",Engineering,Mathematics
ISSN journal
00295981
Volume
40
Issue
18
Year of publication
1997
Pages
3299 - 3312
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-5981(1997)40:18<3299:OCDOIT>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
In the existing finite element calculations of dynamic problems using C-0 structural elements, the inertia terms are evaluated without any r eference to the modifications such as reduced integration, projections etc., typically needed in the discretization of the stiffness terms. A different discretization of inertia is discussed here. It is based o n the following two observations. First, as shown in this work (at lea st for the beam problems), the modified stiffness matrix for a given C -0 element can be obtained by standard, unmodified approach, in which degrees of freedom remain unchanged, but the shape functions are diffe rent. Those modified functions are of higher order and define the tran slational field within the element in terms of both translational and rotational parameters. Second, if standard consistent approach to the formulation of dynamic problems is to be followed, approximation of th e displacement field used in the unmodified evaluation of the stiffnes s terms should also be used in discretization of the inertia terms. Th is implies that the modified higher-order functions should be employed when evaluating the element mass matrix for the C-0 elements with mod ified stiffness matrices. As a consequence of this approach, consisten cy between formulation of the inertia and stiffness terms is restored. This leads to inertial coupling between rotational and translational degrees of freedom, which is absent in standard evaluation of inertia. It is demonstrated that this approach tends to improve accuracy of dy namic computations. (C) 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.