Ja. Purton et al., IMPURITY CATIONS IN THE BULK AND THE (001)SURFACE OF MUSCOVITE - AN ATOMISTIC SIMULATION STUDY, Journal of materials chemistry, 7(9), 1997, pp. 1947-1951
Solution energies are calculated for monovalent and divalent impuritie
s in the bulk and the {001} surface of muscovite, using atomistic simu
lation techniques and a consistent set of interatomic potentials. Csis the most soluble alkali metal cation. There are marked differences
between the bulk and surface solution energies for the smaller univale
nt cations, indicating appreciable segregation to the surface. Without
deprotonation of an OH group, none of the Group 1 cations are able to
enter the hexagonal cavity on the mica basal plane. Small divalent ca
tions are predicted to substitute for octahedral Al with the most favo
urable charge-balance mechanism involving the additional substitution
of Al for Si. The solution mechanism for larger, less soluble divalent
cations involves substitution for K+, with a compensating Al/Si excha
nge. Where possible, results are calculated for two models, the first
assuming complete ordering of Al and Si on the tetrahedral aluminosili
cate sheets and the second completely random ordering. There is little
difference between the values from the two models, with the exception
of the {001} surface energy.