A. Lenzi et al., ANTISPERM ANTIBODY DETECTION .2. CLINICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND STATISTICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN METHODS, American journal of reproductive immunology [1989], 38(3), 1997, pp. 224-230
PROBLEM: In clinical andrology, the detection of antisperm antibodies
(ASA) is regarded as one of the most important steps in the study of m
ale infertility. This practice is generally accepted even though there
is still some disagreement about the true meaning of antisperm immuni
ty, and there remains a good deal of controversy about the test regard
ed as the most suitable for the detection of antibodies directed again
st sperm antigens. international Workshops have tried to standardize u
niversally accepted protocols. A panel of three or four methods is gen
erally advised to provide a correct and complete screening of patients
with antisperm immunity. The aim of the present paper is to report ou
r studies on the correlation between direct methods (IBT, MAR test) an
d indirect methods (gelatin agglutination test [GAT], and tray aggluti
nation test [TAT]) and to establish whether biological models can expl
ain the antibody tests results. An attempt was also made to establish
a ''predictive threshold'' to explain even apparently discordant direc
t and indirect results.