ANTISPERM ANTIBODY DETECTION .2. CLINICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND STATISTICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN METHODS

Citation
A. Lenzi et al., ANTISPERM ANTIBODY DETECTION .2. CLINICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND STATISTICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN METHODS, American journal of reproductive immunology [1989], 38(3), 1997, pp. 224-230
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology",Immunology
ISSN journal
10467408
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
224 - 230
Database
ISI
SICI code
1046-7408(1997)38:3<224:AAD.CB>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
PROBLEM: In clinical andrology, the detection of antisperm antibodies (ASA) is regarded as one of the most important steps in the study of m ale infertility. This practice is generally accepted even though there is still some disagreement about the true meaning of antisperm immuni ty, and there remains a good deal of controversy about the test regard ed as the most suitable for the detection of antibodies directed again st sperm antigens. international Workshops have tried to standardize u niversally accepted protocols. A panel of three or four methods is gen erally advised to provide a correct and complete screening of patients with antisperm immunity. The aim of the present paper is to report ou r studies on the correlation between direct methods (IBT, MAR test) an d indirect methods (gelatin agglutination test [GAT], and tray aggluti nation test [TAT]) and to establish whether biological models can expl ain the antibody tests results. An attempt was also made to establish a ''predictive threshold'' to explain even apparently discordant direc t and indirect results.