In this paper we offer a multiplicity of approaches and procedures for
multiple testing problems with weights. Some rationale for incorporat
ing weights in multiple hypotheses testing are discussed. Various type
-I error-rates and different possible formulations are considered, for
both the intersection hypothesis testing and the multiple hypotheses
testing problems. An optimal per family weighted error-rate controllin
g procedure a la Spjotvoll (1972) is obtained. This model serves as a
vehicle for demonstrating the different implications of the approaches
to weighting. Alternative approaches to that of Holm (1979) for famil
y-wise error-rate control with weights are discussed, one involving an
alternative procedure for family-wise error-rate control, and the oth
er involving the control of a weighted family-wise error-rate. Extensi
ons and modifications of the procedures based on Simes (1986) are give
n. These include a test of the overall intersection hypothesis with ge
neral weights, and weighted sequentially rejective procedures for test
ing the individual hypotheses. The false discovery rate controlling ap
proach and procedure of Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) are extended to al
low for different weights.