In their best-selling book, The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray argu
e that Ie is a powerful predictor of a range of social ills including
crime. They use this ''scientific reality'' to oppose social welfare p
olicies and, in particular to justify the punishment of offenders. By
reanalyzing the data used in The Bell Curve and by reviewing existing
meta-analyses assessing the relative importance of criminogenic risk f
actors, the present authors show empirically that Herrnstein and Murra
y's claims regarding Ie and crime are misleading. The authors conclude
that Herrnstein and Murray's crime control agenda is bared on ideolog
y, not on intelligent criminology.