Fast research has failed to detect consistent relationships between cr
iminal victimization and fear of crime. For women and elderly people h
igher levels of fear have been reported in spite of lower risks of vic
timization when compared to other subgroups. These findings are suppos
ed to be mainly artefacts, resulting from the violation of research re
quirements: an adequate specification of fear indicators, the symmetry
of victimization and fear indicators, the distinction of fear of actu
al as opposed to fictitious victimization, the definition of non-victi
ms, the correction for restriction of range of correlations, the contr
ol of moderator effects, and the consideration of different variances
within subgroups. The relevance of these requirements is demonstrated,
using data from a representative German survey: First, correlational
analyses of different fear indicators confirmed that fear of crime sho
uld not be treated as a homogeneous phenomenon. Second, in applying di
fferent assessment strategies, salience of family context and anonymit
y proved crucial with respect to reporting violent incidents in close
relationships. Finally, repeated analyses with additional methodologic
al controls on every next step demonstrated that the fear-victimizatio
n relationship depends considerably on the computational context.