HELPER T-LYMPHOCYTE COUNT - TRAX CD4 TEST KIT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FLOW-CYTOMETRY

Citation
Aj. Saah et al., HELPER T-LYMPHOCYTE COUNT - TRAX CD4 TEST KIT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FLOW-CYTOMETRY, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 121(9), 1997, pp. 960-962
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
Journal title
Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine
ISSN journal
00039985 → ACNP
Volume
121
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
960 - 962
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9985(1997)121:9<960:HTC-TC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background.-We evaluated a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system for measuring helper T-lymphocyte count. Methods.-Data f rom 111 human immunodeficiency virus-infected injection drug users in a cohort study were analyzed by flow cytometry and independent duplica te runs of the TRAx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results.-The me an helper T-cell counts were 470, 480, and 506 per microliter by flow cytometry and TRAx runs 1 and 2, respectively. The correlation coeffic ients for TRAx runs 1 and 2 with the flow cytometry results as the dep endent variable were .93 and .91, respectively. A cross-tabulation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay helper T-lymphocyte counts with flow cytometry counts showed agreement of 71% and 76% when the flow co unt was between 201 and 500, and 88% and 90% when it was greater than 500 cells per microliter. In those samples with 200 or fewer helper T cells, agreement was 73% and 41% for each TRAx run. Conclusions.-The T RAx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system is an acceptable method f or measuring helper T-lymphocyte count, but should be recalibrated for better performance at helper T-cell counts below 200 per microliter.