Fd. Burstein et al., THE USE OF POROUS GRANULAR HYDROXYAPATITE IN SECONDARY ORBITOCRANIAL RECONSTRUCTION, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 100(4), 1997, pp. 869-874
The search for the ideal bone-graft substitute has been the focus of m
any research and clinical studies. Hydroxyapatite is one such material
that combines osseointegration with maintenance of implant volume and
excellent durability. We present our experience in 29 patients rangin
g in age from 3 to 22 years (mean age 10.5 years) who underwent second
ary orbitocranial reconstruction of large contour defects utilizing po
rous granular hydroxyapatite. Follow-up ranges from 6 to 72 months (me
an 30 months). Indications for secondary surgery included residual bon
y contour defects of the frontal bone, temporal areas, and superior or
bital rims that were present 12 months or more after initial surgery.
There was one infection secondary to a chronic seroma necessitating re
moval of the porous hydroxyapatite, and one patient required revision
for underfilling and another for overfilling. Excellent permanent cont
our improvement was obtained with a smooth skin surface in the remaind
er of our patients. The contour corrections have been long lasting, wi
thout evidence of porous hydroxyapatite resorption or migration.