This paper examines how ethnic Dutch residents of two old neighborhood
s in the city of Rotterdam use the notion of ''culture'' when they tal
k and argue among themselves about the multi-ethnic area they live in.
Some of the ways in which culture as a discourse is used are outlined
and some of the possible effects such a discourse may have are discus
sed. It is shown that the term culture is used in a self-evident and s
elf-sufficient way as a commonplace. In addition, most of the inhabita
nts use a reified and essentialistic notion of culture for constructin
g ''us'' and ''them'' distinctions. Cultural differences are evaluated
in favor df one's own group and used for arguing for the incompatibil
ity of cultural groups. Three conceptualizations of culture can be dis
tinguished. All three have the effect of ''blaming the victim,'' but e
ach attributes a different degree of blame to immigrant groups: cultur
e as heritage, culture as doctrine, and culture as mentality. The noti
on of culture is used flexibly and in a self-serving way to explain di
fferent phenomena. However, cultural change and personal determination
are recognized. Also the presence of immigrant groups is accepted and
the need to find some sort of modus vivendi is acknowledged.