Objectives. To evaluate the BTA stat Test in the detection of recurren
t bladder cancer. Methods. Sensitivity and specificity were determined
using frozen voided urine samples from patients with recurrent bladde
r cancer, volunteers, patients with nonurologic conditions, and patien
ts with a history of bladder cancer but free of disease. Results of cy
tology and the original BTA Test were compared with the sensitivity of
the BTA stat Test in a large subgroup of the patients with cancer. Re
sults. The BTA stat Test detected 147 (57%) of 220 recurrent cancers.
For those urine samples with previous cytologic and BTA Test results a
vailable, cytology had a sensitivity of 23%, the BTA Test 44%, and the
BTA stat Test 58% for detection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001, stat
versus cytology). The specificity of the BTA stat Test was 72% for ben
ign genitourinary disease and 95% in healthy volunteers. Conclusions.
The BTA stat Test has high sensitivity and is significantly superior t
o voided urine cytologic analysis in the detection of recurrent bladde
r cancer. (C) 1997, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.