EXPRESSION OF GLUCOSE TRANSPORTERS IN HUMAN PANCREATIC TUMORS COMPARED WITH INCREASED FDG ACCUMULATION IN PET STUDY

Citation
T. Higashi et al., EXPRESSION OF GLUCOSE TRANSPORTERS IN HUMAN PANCREATIC TUMORS COMPARED WITH INCREASED FDG ACCUMULATION IN PET STUDY, The Journal of nuclear medicine, 38(9), 1997, pp. 1337-1344
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
01615505
Volume
38
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1337 - 1344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-5505(1997)38:9<1337:EOGTIH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Although overexpression of GLUT-1 glucose transporter has already been reported in human cancers, the mechanism of glucose entry into pancre atic cancers remains unknown. To evaluate the relationship between GLU T glucose transporters and FDG uptake, FDG-PET was performed in 34 pre operative patients (mean age, 60.9 yr) with suspected pancreatic tumor s, including 28 malignant and 6 benign tumors. Methods: FDG uptake at 50 min after injection of 185 MBq of [F-18]FDG with >5 hr of fasting w as semiquantitatively analyzed as standardized uptake values (SUVs). T he GLUT expression was studied by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sec tions from these tumors after operation using anti-GLUT-1, -2, -3, -4 and -5 antibodies to obtain immunohistochemical grading (''strong, ''w eak'' and ''negative'') by three experienced physicians. Results: Of 2 6 malignant tumors proved by histological examination, 23 (88%) tumors were positive for the expression of GLUT-I glucose transporter, and 1 7(61%)showed strong expression. On the other hand, 13 (46%), 0 (0%), 9 (36%) and 13 (46%) malignant tumors were positive for the expression of GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5 glucose transporters, respectively. Three of six benign tumors showed strong GLUT-I expression. Concerning GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5, only one benign tumor showed positive GLUT-5 expression . Thus, GLUT-I showed relatively high sensitivity but low specificity (50%) for detecting malignant tumors, whereas GLUT-2, -3, -4 and -5 ha d lower sensitivities but higher specificities. Correlations between S UVs and grading of GLUT immunoreactivity were significant in GLUT-1 (s trong, 4.49 +/- 2.95; weak, 3.42 +/- 1.21; negative, 2.52 +/- 0.84) (p < 0.05) but not in the remaining four GLUT transporters. Conclusion: These data indicate that GLUT-I has a significant role in the malignan t glucose metabolism and may contribute to the increased uptake of FDG in PET imaging in patients with pancreatic tumor.