H. Goschel et al., BOTULINUM A TOXIN THERAPY - NEUTRALIZING AND NONNEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES-THERAPEUTIC CONSEQUENCES, Experimental neurology, 147(1), 1997, pp. 96-102
Although muscle-relaxant doses of botulinum A toxin (BoNT/A) are gener
ally lower than doses stimulating the immune system, specific antibodi
es are raised in a substantial number of patients. As a rule, this nec
essitates the termination of treatment. Therefore, a reliable determin
ation of specific anti-BoNT/A antibodies is helpful and we introduced,
for this purpose, a novel in vitro toxin-neutralizing assay based on
a nerve-muscle preparation. We measured the antibody titers in four gr
oups of subjects: Group 1 comprised 75 randomly selected patients of a
total of 295 who responded to treatment with Dysport in our local cli
nic. Five patients, in group 2, were nonresponders. Group 3 consisted
of 32 untreated volunteers and group 4 of 8 subjects immunized with a
toroid more than 10 years ago. Two of the responders had marginal tite
rs of neutralizing antibodies, while they were present in all nonrespo
nders. The sera of all responders were also tested for nonneutralizing
antibodies by ELISA. Their occurrence, however, was of no consequence
to the therapeutic success. The blood samples of volunteers were free
from specific antibodies, whereas antibodies persisted in the immuniz
ed subjects for longer than a decade. Patients from various clinics wh
o had been treated unsuccessfully with the toxin-14 patients had recei
ved BOTOX, 7 had been treated with Dysport, and 7 with both products-a
ll had neutralizing antibodies. Whether there was an antibody response
depended on the amount of toxin administered. We believe, however, th
e effective toxin dose can be reduced by so much as to make antibody p
roduction highly improbable. (C) 1997 Academic Press.