Historians of state formation have increasingly recognized what Foucau
lt has described as the 'dark side' of the enlightenment institutional
principles of representation, transparency and accountability and exp
lored the parallel principles of legitimation, surveillance and discip
line. In this paper, I pursue these themes in a neglected area, the in
stitutional architecture of rural space. I do so by examining ideologi
es of rural planning in western Canada and the American midwest in the
early twentieth century. These ideologies were linked to state projec
ts, and found institutional expression in Canada in the 'town planning
movement' attached to municipal and provincial planning offices, and
in the United States in agricultural extension services and the 'count
y agent' system-the local 'inspectorate' of the Federal Department of
Agriculture. The aim was a restructuring of rural space in the interes
ts of rationalizing agricultural production and controlling large popu
lations of settlers, recently displaced, and disturbingly 'isolated' a
nd inaccessible in the vast spaces of the great plains, Despite common
aims, American and Canadian reformers adopted fundamentally different
principles of spatial design. Town planners inherited the European as
sumption that community networks and class relations were embedded in
particular spatial arrangements, so that rural reform required re-draw
ing the boundaries of fields and settlements, As early as 1915, Americ
an reformers developed the idea that networks of sociability and domin
ation were defined first by abstract structures, formal organizations
and the cash nexus, and could, using modern media of communication, be
'disembedded' from particular locales and distributed spatially.