COMPARISON BETWEEN CARDIAC-OUTPUT MEASURED BY THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE AND CALCULATED BY O-2 AND MODIFIED CO2 FICK METHODS USING A NEW METABOLIC MONITOR
Ls. Brandi et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN CARDIAC-OUTPUT MEASURED BY THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE AND CALCULATED BY O-2 AND MODIFIED CO2 FICK METHODS USING A NEW METABOLIC MONITOR, Intensive care medicine, 23(8), 1997, pp. 908-915
Objective: To calculate cardiac output from dual oximetry with carbon
dioxide production (VCO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) measured by a n
ew metabolic monitor, and to compare these values with measurements ma
de simultaneously using the thermodilution method during the steady st
ate condition. Design: Prospective, comparative clinical study. Settin
g: The adult postsurgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a University Ho
spital, Patients: Twenty mechanically ventilated postsurgical patients
(70.7 +/- 7.8 years of age; range 50-54). Measurements and results: A
new metabolic monitor (Puritan-Bennett 7250, Carlsbard. USA) connecte
d to a ventilator (Puritan-Bennett 7200) was used to measure VCO2 and
VO2. Measurements of arterial (SaO(2)) and mixed venous (SvO(2)) oxyge
n saturations were made using pulse and venous fiberoptic oximeters. C
ardiac output starting from VCO2 (COVCO2) was obtained according to Ma
hutte's formula: COVCO2 = VCO2/[k (SaO(2) - SvO(2))], where k represen
ts a constant. The value for each patient was determined from the init
ial measurements of thermodilution cardiac output (COtd), VCO2, SaO(2)
and SvO(2). COVCO2 calculated from the previous equation was compared
to the COtd. Cardiac output calculated from the traditional O-2 Fick
equation (COVO2) was compared to the COtd. All patients were studied o
ver a period of 120 min at 15-min intervals in reasonably stable condi
tions. COVOC2 was closely related to COtd (r = 0.94; SEE = 0.79; p = 0
.0001; ii = 180) with a bias of 0.10 and a precision of 0.45 1/min. Th
e mean percent difference between the two methods was -2.2 +/- 8.3 %.
COVO2 was related to COtd (r = 0.77; SEE = 0.79; p = 0.0001; n = 180)
with a bias of - 0.57 and precision of 0.86 1/min, The mean percent di
ffer ence between the two methods was - 10.8 +/- 16.0 %. Conclusions:
In stable patients, cardiac output measurements obtained from dual oxi
metry with VO2 and VCO2 measured by this new metabolic monitor, show g
ood correlation with measurements made using the thermodilution method
. The values of cardiac output calculated from VCO2 are more accurate
and precise than values from VO2. The validity of these measurements i
n hemodynamically unstable patients and during various modes of mechan
ical ventilation seems warranted.