GENDER DIFFERENCES IN BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS USE OF HEARING PROTECTION

Citation
Sl. Lusk et al., GENDER DIFFERENCES IN BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS USE OF HEARING PROTECTION, Women & health, 25(4), 1997, pp. 69-89
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Women s Studies","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
03630242
Volume
25
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
69 - 89
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-0242(1997)25:4<69:GDIBWU>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
In this study, the Health Promotion Model (HPM) was used as the basis for a structural equation model of male and female blue collar workers ' self-reported use of hearing protection devices (HPDs). Overall use did not differ by gender; in addition, self-efficacy and barriers to u se of HPDs were the two best predictors of this behavior for both men and women. Despite the similarities in HPD use and the most important predictors of that use between men and women, the predictive models di ffered by gender in several ways. Significant predictors of use among men also included age and value of use of HPDs. For women, ethnic stat us and plant site were additional significant predictors of use. Becau se the influences of plant site and gender on self-reported use of HPD s could not be separated in this study, further research should addres s worksite culture and assess differences by gender. Knowledge of thes e differences will aid development of more effective interventions and may increase the use of hearing protection.