B. Davanzo et al., AN ASSESSMENT, AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF FOOD FREQUENCY DATA PROVIDED BYHOSPITAL CONTROLS, European journal of cancer prevention, 6(3), 1997, pp. 288-293
In order to assess the comparability and reproducibility of informatio
n from a questionnaire used in a case-control study on digestive tract
cancers conducted in Italy, a total of 400 subjects were randomly sel
ected from a large sample of hospital controls and contacted at home t
o repeat the interview. Of these, 294 (73%) subjects were re-interview
ed. Mean values of intake were computed for the 400 subjects selected,
and among the 294 responders for the first and second interview. Thes
e values were comparable, most of them being within a 10% range. Spear
man correlation coefficient (r(s)) values of consumption between the f
irst and second interview were > 0.65 for consumption of pastries, pas
ta or rice, bread, fish, milk, green vegetables, eggs and apples; betw
een 0.50 and 0.65 for meat, chicken, liver, ham, cold cuts, cheese, fr
uit, cabbage, carrots, tomatoes, peppers, salad, citrus fruit and melo
n; and lower than 0.50 for a few infrequently eaten foods. For all foo
ds, the estimated average weekly intake in the second interview increa
sed consistently and substantially with increasing tertile of the firs
t interview. This study shows a satisfactory comparability of dietary
information from subjects interviewed at home with that provided durin
g their original interview in the hospital, and a good reproducibility
of information collected in the two settings.