INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF RIGHT BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK INPATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION RECEIVING THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY

Citation
Am. Moreno et al., INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF RIGHT BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK INPATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION RECEIVING THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY, International journal of cardiology, 61(2), 1997, pp. 135-141
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
01675273
Volume
61
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
135 - 141
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-5273(1997)61:2<135:IAPORB>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
We assessed the incidence and prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) receiving thrombolytic therapy. A prospective, one-year follow-up stu dy involving 681 consecutive patients treated with thrombolytic agents for AMI was performed. Seventy-four patients developed RBBB (46% new- onset, 24% old and 30% indeterminate). RBBB was more common in older p atients with large anterior AMI. New-onset RBBB were often transient ( 56%) and 84% of them resolved within 12 h after admission. Complicatin g events during the hospital phase, such as ventricular arrhythmias an d development of heart failure, were more frequent in patients with RB BB. In-hospital and one-year mortality were higher in patients with RB BB (22.9 and 40.5% compared to 7.9 and 12.3% respectively in patients without block, both p<0.001). New-onset, non-transient RBBB were assoc iated with the highest mortality rates (73% at one-year follow-up). By multivariate analysis, RBBB was retained as independent predictor of in-hospital and one-year mortality. We conclude that new-onset RBBB in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for AMI is often transient. T he development of RBBB has a negative and independent prognostic impac t on the survival during the hospital phase and at one-year follow-up. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.