Dw. Vandiver et Sw. Kirsch, A FIELD-TEST OF AN ELECTRICAL-CAPACITANCE METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL-WATER CONTENT, Physical geography, 18(1), 1997, pp. 80-87
Several studies have compared gravimetric sampling to the neutron-atte
nuation method of soil-water measurement. However, less is known of th
e relationship between these two methods and a more recently developed
technique based on electrical capacitance. Our field experiment allow
ed us to: (1) determine the accuracy of the neutron-moderation and ele
ctrical-capacitance methods by comparison to gravimetric sampling; (2)
establish a relationship between the three methods; and (3) determine
the field effectiveness, applicability, and ease of operation of the
methods. The principal hypotheses are that we can establish the relati
onship between the three methods using simple regression, and that the
three methods give statistically equivalent measures of soil-water co
ntent and thus can be used interchangeably. An alternative hypothesis
is that no valid relationship exists between the three methods, with e
ach giving a statistically different measure of soil-water content. We
found that the electrical-capacitance method provides a viable altern
ative to the neutron-attenuation method of soil-water measurement in t
he field.