T. Lingenfelser et al., PYLORIC MOTOR RESPONSE TO CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NITRIC-OXIDE IN THE FERRET, Neurogastroenterology and motility, 9(3), 1997, pp. 167-175
This study has investigated the relative importance of central nervous
and peripheral nitroxidergic mechanisms in the control of pyloric mot
ility. In 10 urethane-anaesthetized ferrets, drugs were administered d
irectly to the CNS via a 0.5-mm-diameter cannula inserted into the 4th
ventricle, approximately at the obex. Drugs were also given directly
to the upper GI tract by close intra-arterial (i.a.) injection at the
coeliac axis. Antropyloroduodenal pressures were recorded with a five-
channel sleeve/sidehole micromanometric assembly (1.35 x 1.75 mm o.d.)
, which was introduced via the duodenum. Pyloric motility was stimulat
ed throughout the main part of each study with a continuous i.v. infus
ion of CCK-8 (30 pmol min(-1)). This infusion produced an immediate an
d sustained increase in tonic and phasic pyloric activity, and sustain
ed abolition of antral pressure waves. CCK-8 also induced a duodenal m
otor response, but this was short-lived (11.4 +/- 7.9 min). Coeliac ax
is injection of the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP) d
ecreased phasic pyloric activity (from 330 +/- 35 to 148 +/- 21 mmHg m
in(-1) after SNAP 5 mu g, P < 0.01). By comparison, central SNAP admin
istration over the same dose range had no effect on CCK-stimulated pyl
oric motility. Inhibition of endogenous NO synthase with L-Nitro Argin
ine Methyl Ester (L-NAME, 100 mg kg(-1) close i.a.) caused a marked in
crease of phasic pyloric motor activity from 349 +/- 59 to 1044 +/- 14
0 mmHg min(-1) (P < 0.02). In addition, SNAP caused marked stimulation
of pyloric tone from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 13.1 +/- 2.8 mmHg (P < 0.02). Cen
tral nervous administration of L-NAME caused modest enhancement of pha
sic pyloric activity (248 +/- 31 to 283 +/- 32 mmHg min(-1) P < 0.05)
and pyloric tone (2.6 +/- 0.5 to 3.7 +/- 0.7 mmHg, P < 0.05). Our data
indicate that motor activity of the ferret pylorus is potently modula
ted by NO released within the upper gut. Additionally, there is potent
ial for modulation of pyloric motility by central nervous system produ
ction of NO.